Just when you thought that maybe “feminine” plastic surgery had exhausted its self as it ran out of female body parts to snip, tuck and inflate – sorry to disappoint you but you are wrong.
Dr Matlock a LA Plastic Surgeon who is the media face of vaginal rejuvenation is now urging us ladies to “feel the rush” with his new….
G Spot amplification.
The G-SHOT® (clinical description: G-Spot Amplification® or GSA®), is a simple, nonsurgical, physician-administered treatment that can temporarily augment the Grafenburg spot (G-Spot) in sexually active women with normal sexual function.
Using – a specially developed and processed collagen.
You know – if some men started behaving and believing that we are the complete human package and not a selection of parts and “spots” with magic buttons. Not zones or areas but a big inter related map – then things may start to improve.
Aside from the blatant, aggressive and persistent way that unnecessary plastic surgery is being offered to women – because somehow we cannot possibly be content with our own sexuality and body parts – please cast your eyes over the associated risks with this proceedure.
Investigative Journalist Tristan Taormino goes to meet Dr. Matlock
Bleeding
Infections
Urinary retentions
Accelerated collagen re-absorption
No effect at all
Allergic reactions
Constant awareness of the G-Spot
A sensation of always being sexually aroused
Constant vaginal wetness
Mental preoccupation of the G-Spot
Alteration of the function of the G-Spot
Sexual function alterations
Haematoma (collection of blood)
Collagen site ulceration
Urethral injury (tube you urinate through)
Urinary retentions
Hematuria (blood in urine)
UTI (Urinary Tract Infection)
Urinary Urgency (feel like you always have to urinate)
Urinary Frequency
Increased/worsening nocturia (waking up several times at night to urinate)
Change in urinary stream
Urethral vaginal fistula (hole between urethra and vagina)
Vesico-vaginal fistula (hole between bladder and vagina)
Dyspareunia (Painful intersourse)
Need for subsequent surgery
Alteration of vaginal sensations
Scar formation (vaginal)
Urethral stricture (abnormal narrowing of the urethra)
Local tissue infarction and necrosis
Yeast infections
Vaginal Discharges
Spotting between periods
Bladder Pains
Overactive Bladder (OAB)
Bladder Fullness
Exposed Material
Pelvic Pains
Pelvic Heaviness
Collagen injected into the bladder or urethra
Erosion
Fatigue
Damage to nearby organs including bladder, urethra and ureters
Alteration of bladder dynamics
Post-operative pain
Prolonged pain
Intractable pain
Alteration of the female sexual response cycle
Failed procedure
Varied results
Psychological alterations
Relationship problems
Sex life alteration
Decreased sexual function
Possible hospitalization for treatment of complications
Lidocaine toxicity
Anesthesia reaction
Embolism
Depression
Reactions to medications including anaphylaxis
Nerve damage
Permanent numbness
Slow healing
Swelling
Sexual dysfunction
Allergy to Collagen material
Collagen migration
Nodule formation
This would be funny if it wasn’t so sad. The ignorance of women’s bodies is amazing. Here we have a physician (what, 10 years plus medical education?) who has presumably studied anatomy and physiology who either doesn’t know or is willfully ignorant of the fact that the G spot (the underside of the urethra, always there, always willing to get involved) will AMPLIFY all on it’s own if the women is AROUSED. How we get aroused is probably also a complete mystery to the bonehead doctor, whose colleague is, at this moment, getting a patent on something we can TAKE or APPLY to ourselves. Be sure you don’t apply your testosterone cream anywhere the penis might come in contact. The chemically built one is carcinogenic. Would want anyone’s willy to fall off. Your clit. Ehh!? You needed it for what, again?
Pony – that is exactly where I was coming from with the
[...]complete human package and not a selection of parts and “spots” with magic buttons. Not zones or areas but a big inter related map – then things may start to improve.
I noted that he is a member of the FACOG. Honestly this is shocking – where are the ethics? Collagen in the G Spot – bigger is better or something? Sheesh it’s beyond me.
No it is not shocking but makes logical sense in a perverted way. Since this arrogant and ignorant physican wants female sexuality to respond and act at all times in accordance with male heterosexual preferences and practices. Female sexuality is not independent or autonomous it is there solely for the sexual satisfaction of men and if a woman dares to express her sexual desires which are considered as abberant then of course she is in immediate need of ‘fixing’ either by creams or invasive surgery. Serious side-effects are totally irrelevant because of course male sexual gratification is paramount.
Lesbian sexuality is still perceived as abberant or else it is portrayed in mainstream media, as existing for men to leer at and become sexually aroused. Do not forget women’s sexuality is always for the sexual satisfaction of men – not their own. Women do not have desires or rather their only supposed desire is to service men sexually.
Small article in free paper today claimed that ‘red-blooded men’ will really enjoy film entitled Gray Matters, because the two female leads engage in pseudo lesbian activities. So, it makes sense that women’s anatomy be surgically altered in order to give men even greater sexual pleasure. There is a very, very long history of medical men defining female sexualities from a phallocentric perspective and this latest one is just another in a very long history of women’s sexualities being constrained, controlled and policed by male-centered definitions of what actually supposedly comprises ‘real sex.’ Clitorial removal was practised in the 19th century, invasive surgery on many women’s vaginal areas was undertaken in the 20th century in order to prevent women from involuntarily contracting muscles and thereby suffering from vagininism. Dilators of various sizes continue to be recommended to many heterosexual women in order to ‘assist’ them overcome resistance to penetrative heterosexual sex. All in the name of supposedly assisting women gain a better sexual life and increased sexual satisfaction. Just who are these men kidding? Many women sadly, because despite sexuality being a social construction it is still widely believed that all women can easily reach climax via penetration, all women experience sexual gratification when their G-spots are stimulated, all women are multi-orgasmic. All women really want and need penetration in order to achieve sexual satisfaction, all women immediately become sexually aroused when a man initiates sexual contact and of course the greatest myth of all – it is men alone who bring women to climax since female sexual satisfaction is not autonomous but dependent on that wonderful male organ – the penis! Hence the sexual insult often levied at women who dare to defy male authority and domination – ‘all she needs is a good lay!’
Hi, Sparkle,
I can’t seem to find a contact address for you on this blog.
I’m an Australian university student, writing an article about the now-defunct http://www.stopmyabortion.blogspot.com site and I was told that you’d posted about it when it was still running. I’d like to get your views on the site and its creator and find out if those views have changed with time. If you’re willing to exchange mail on the subject or better yet give an interview in yahoo chat or messenger, please contact me at the address I’ve left here. Thanks.
Adrian Luca
darkgrrl@iprimus.com.au
I had heard of the collagen G-spot injections a little while ago, just cannot believe that anyone would believe pumping the area with collagen is ‘an enhancement’. I believe they also do the same ‘enhancement’ for the clitoris as well. (WTF!)
Picking up where Jennifer left off, and agreeing that ‘women’s sexuality is never autonomous and exists only for the male pleasure/arousal’, I would add to the vaginal dilators that it is a lose-lose situation for women all around.
I’m going to call it, the Impossible Goldilocks Syndrome (IGS). The 19thC may have seen expansion (read: easy access, little/no resistance to penile penetration), but the emphasis in the 20th/21stC is the era of ‘tight pussy’ (read: increase friction for penis and enhance [his] pleasure).
Too big, too small – is there ever a vagina that is “just right” to please da menz? It’s IGS. Big breasts, small breasts, again, it’s IGS. Natural breasts, silicone breasts, IGS. The list is pretty much endless on ‘women’s inadequacies’ (perceived and manufactured of course).
A woman’s sanity can be enhanced by ignoring all of this cultural BS. This is the Dr Stormy way (consultations, free!).
Picking up on #5 from the side effects list “No effect at all”, I guess it would never cross the dude’s [tiny] brain that his relentless pumping of the almighty cock wouldn’t count for a hill of beans no matter how much artificial gunk was injected into ‘the G-spot’, and that his pornified, pornucated performance (as lousy lover) wasn’t to blame, but instead, the failure of ‘the procedure’ (of dubious worth).
*sigh*
The pat brainwash women into thinking male-defined sexuality is what they want (females)- then, the females start demanding what the males actually want, thereby saving men all the work of having to talk women into it – the system has progressed quite nicely in the last decade or so.
Here’s another link by a reporter Tristan Taormino who went to investigate the woman hating Dr matlock.
http://www.villagevoice.com/people/0416,taormino,52770,24.html
Along with all the other western gynecology procedures done on women including episiotomy–to fascillitate delivery made difficult to impossible by male invented obstetrical procedures which are dangerous and unnecessary, oophorectomy–of healthy ovaries “just in case’–hysterectomy “you won’t be needing it anymore”, and less invasive and effective procedures are available but don’t pay as well, cervical anti-cancer injections–only for females but where do genital warts come from, labiaplasty, vaginal “enhancement”, clitoral enlargement, breast enlarging, nipple reconstruction, and mastectomies–when removing the breast is useless to stop cancer already mestasicized, and less invasive procedures are available and effective. This all is FGM western and North American style.
When recently I avoided a TAH BSO, total abdominal hysterectomy and bi-lateral salpingeo oophorectomy with all the attendent devastation that causes, I consulted academic gynecologists in Canada, the US, Denmark, The Netherlands and Belgium. I found the Canadian and US gynes but one, recommended the full procedure. The European ones said all, “we do not do castration for those reasons”. Castration you see, is what it is. We just hide FGM and castration behind nicer words, and scare-mongering, and prettification when mutilation is for women.
Pony – Yes Yes
So many lay people don’t even know that an oophorectomy is castration. Can you imagine a doc suggesting to a male patient “Oh well, we’ll just whip your testicles off in case that prostate/penile whatever is hormone dependent/likely to metastasise” Can you seriously?
So many of the medical profession treat women like fucking cattle.
Saying that my friend was recently in hospital for a more than likely oophorectomy but when she came round they were pleased to tell her that the surgeon had managed to save it. Actually extending the surgery time – and she is post menopause.
So I suppose I’ll give him a gold star – or something
At 37 when I was told “you’re going to die a horrible death” if I didn’t have castration, the oncologist-gyne also told me I was the possessor of “a very dangerous organ”. This conversation took place with him standing and me laying there covered in spots with a miniscule pink sheet of paper. Pink because we were in the cancer clinic, see? Where they rip out and off your female organs, but give you pink stuff.
Anyway. having been reading various guerrilla healthcare books, such as by Barbara Seaman and others, I leapt off the table, pink in hand and stood square in front of him trembling and shaking and snot faced, and said “your brain is the only dangerous organ in this room.”
He turned on heel and said as he left “you are going to die a horrible death.”
So you know, I’m 64 and still have it all. Intact. There are lots of reasons to keep your organs that you “won’t be needing anymore”. Some to do with health, and others to do with sexual function.
Ha! good for you. Honestly fancy saying “you are going to die a horrible death” that’s evil.
I had Pre-eclampsia with my son (bloody boys nowt but trouble lol) and the Doc told me “Hummp you are in BIG trouble my girl”
Eek – I was freaking terrified – well, be both ended up having a brush with the grim-reaper so I suppose he was right – but err yunno bed side manner and that ???
He was in his 60s so I’m pretty sure he’s not around anymore. But I’ve always wondered where the two nurses are who stood apart from us, in stupified shock. I am certain, being the subservient handmaidens most nurses were then, and often still are (present company and one other nurse I can think of excepted) it was *my* comment that shocked, the temerity of a patient standing up to him, and saying what I did, that had their mouths hanging open and them goggle eyed at each other.
Oophorectomy, yeah I know what one is—I declined (indignantly!) the offer when it was put to me just under 10 years ago.
Castration, nope, I’ll pass thank you very much. Still got all the bits intact!
(Actually, I think when I was not so graciously declining the offer, I may have referred to it as castration!! Spade is a spade)
Yes, they call it a castration when they’re talking to or about men. No euphemisms and colour coded coyness then. We noticed you’ve still got your testicles and prostate Mr. Jones. Potentially dangerous organs now that you won’t be having more children. Hmmmph. When we’re removing that little polyp we’ll be removing those organs too. It’s for your own good. While we’re in the area.
That’s exactly the sort of thing they say Pony.
The only legitimate removal of organs or glands is when they are confirmed cancerous, not ‘possibly cancerous at some vague time in the future, maybe, perhaps…’.
That list makes me woozy. Add ‘faintness’ and ‘nausea’ to the side effects of the side effects.
Pony, I’m f’ing appalled with the piss poor experiences you’ve had with doctors, not only what I’ve read here but also in some other comments you’ve posted here and there about them. The way that doctors have talked to you, talked down to you, talked about you as if you are an object and in your presence, talked about your body parts to you… it’s inexcusable. I’ve never experienced anything like that from doctors. Granted, I have had a couple of doctors speak to me condescendingly, both males, of course, and only once each because I didn’t go back to either of them again. The experience you’ve described here was a couple of decades ago, so I’m wondering if the difference is that of women’s treatment at the hands of the medical community then and now? I mean, were your experiences typical for women patients at that time? Or were your experiences piss poor and appalling compared with other women’s experiences then, too?
Incidentally, after being told by a male doctor during a pap smear that the pain I felt couldn’t be because there are no nerve endings “there” (as if he knew exactly which “there” he had just jabbed the hell out of that caused me to jump several inches off the examination table) as if he, too, has had a speculum crammed up his vagina every year of his adulthood, I’ve been to only women doctors. Having been to both male doctors and female doctors, I’ve come to the conclusion that women are better doctors, at least for me they are.
My current doctor confided in me that she, too, hates having her annual exam and pap smear. She said that lying there with her feet in stirrups while being poked and probed makes her feel vulnerable and undignified (is that the right word?), just as I do, which is why she tries to perform paps as quickly and gently as possible. The way that she can empathize with other women in that position and male doctors can’t is very much apparent to me when I’m on that damned table.
It was also she who discovered that I didn’t have asthma at all, as I’d believed for years, that I have bronchial allergies. She discovered that by simply flipping through the pages of my file and noting the dates of the previous office visits for wheezing (October then May then October then May…). I don’t recall ever seeing a male doctor do that. No, come to think of it, it was a male dentist who prescribed amoxycillan to my nephew even though I’d not only written that on his info sheet the day of his visit but it’s also listed on the document that states that I’ve been given rights by his parents to seek medical care for him and that I’d provided a copy for his file. So, I guess they aren’t real keen on reading.
God forbid! I use sentia for increasing my libido, have good results (now I’m able to have orgasms), but I have never heard about “feminine” plastic surgery. No, no, no! Not for me.
[...] In addition women if you do happen to find the G-spot and it’s somewhat inadequate or in needing o… [...]